I was on Church of the Larger Fellowship‘s The VUU last week on a segment we called Correlations and Covenants. I talked about data and the implications of knowing who we are more clearly. That’s why I love numbers so much. They can break down assumptions and help us see ourselves and our context more clearly so we can make better decisions as to how we change our behaviors and/ or allocate resources and so much more. I’m going to try to set aside Friday’s blog post for tastes of data in form of (mostly) pie charts.
While talking on The VUU I threw out some numbers and then immediately regretted not having pie charts ready for people to “see” the numbers. I’d like to remedy that here. I now present to you two pies…
What was your assumption before looking at the pie chart above? So many leaders at the regional and national level are from mid-size and larger congregations. We often bring our assumptions that most of our congregations are like our own. And look at that! Over two thirds of our congregations have <160 members!
Another common assumption is that most of our adult members attend the large congregations. Another way to look at that is assuming that most of our adult membership is carried by large congregations.
From this pie chart you can see that most of our adult membership resides in the Small and Mid-Size Pastoral size. The rest of the categories are fairly evenly split.
How does this change your concept of who we are as an Association? How does it change your concept of your own congregation in relationship to the collective? I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comment area.
Rev. Tandi Rogers spends about an eighth of her job researching and analyzing data on behalf of the UUA Board, Leadership Council, and Congregational Life staff. She also serves on the Faith Communities Today interfaith consortium of religious data geeks.